6
platforms evaluated head-to-head
1
recommendation, clearly justified
100%
of must-have requirements mapped
⚠ Placeholder case study — client name and figures pending sign-off.
Challenge
Too many options, no clear way to choose
The legal team knew it needed a CLM but faced a market full of look-alike demos and competing claims. Leadership wanted a choice that would hold up to scrutiny, not a gut call that someone would second-guess later.
Approach
Requirements first, demos second
We pinned down what the team actually needed, scored six platforms against those requirements, and ran the demos to the same script so the comparison was fair. The output was a clear ranking with the reasoning written down.
Result
A decision leadership could defend
The university chose with confidence, backed by a documented evaluation and a rollout plan. When questions came up later, the answer was already on paper.