Blogs
Agiloft vs Conga: What works best for your business
Agiloft edges out Conga for most teams in a Gartner CLM comparison, scoring higher on adoption, document search, support, and roadmap. Here is how the two contract platforms stack up, and how to choose.
Agiloft edges out Conga for most teams choosing a CLM platform. A Gartner comparison across the four dimensions that matter most (user experience, functionality, support, and version control) put Agiloft ahead on adoption, document search, end-user training, and roadmap clarity. Both are capable CLM software options; the difference is one of degree, not a knockout. Here is how they compare on each.
CLM software comparison: Conga vs Agiloft
Since these options have become the best contract solutions available, it is important to reveal where they differ. While there are many features to evaluate, we’ve selected the 4 most relevant according to the latest Gartner report:
User experience (UX)
In this review of Agiloft vs Conga, UX seems pretty solid when contrasting client feedback for each system. Generally speaking, customers show satisfaction with ease of use, configuration, learning curve, customization, and more.
Despite this seemingly equal performance, people are more inclined to favor Agiloft because of faster pick-up. We should note that its latest version only requires light training for first or non-technical users.
Functionality
If you need a hint of customer-orientation, you should evaluate the tools for contract management efficiency. Expressly, each software offers top of the line functions to reduce risk, eliminate mistakes, speed-up turnaround, and improve compliance.
Nonetheless, many customers scored Conga below the average for its ability to search full-document text, including inquiry across PDFs and other attachments. Some users noted that they found the search capabilities not quite intuitive.
Support and training
Startups and Fortune 100 companies use Agiloft due to readiness, fast integration, and seamless operation with little training. Whereas Conga clients claim the quality and availability of end-user training is a weakness, many say they were dissatisfied.
Agiloft suites can help different kinds of businesses to build long term relationships, develop strong communication, and include constant updates. In contrast, reference customers for Conga said they’d like more notifications before significant changes and disliked frequent substitution of account agents.
Version control
When talking about Agiloft vs Conga, the future product roadmap of Conga was less detailed than other vendors which affected its score for market understanding and global completeness of vision.
On the other hand, Agiloft Company is known for taking head-on the current challenges faced by the industry. This brand has developed a clear disposition alongside its customer journey and future plans for its renowned solutions.
Overall, in the battle of Agiloft vs Conga, the first solution comes on top by some margin. If you need guidance to work with the best CLM software, our representatives are standing by.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Agiloft or Conga better for contract management?
- Agiloft edges out Conga for most teams in the Gartner comparison, scoring higher on user adoption, full-document search, end-user support, and product-roadmap clarity. Both are capable CLM platforms, and the gap is one of degree, so the right pick still depends on your specific requirements.
- Where does Conga fall short compared to Agiloft?
- Conga scored below average on searching full-document and PDF text, and its reference customers flagged weaker end-user training and a less detailed product roadmap. Those were the main areas where Agiloft pulled ahead in the review.
- Which CLM platform has the easier learning curve?
- Agiloft has the easier learning curve in this comparison. Reviewers report faster pick-up, and its newer versions need only light training for non-technical or first-time users.
- How should we choose between Agiloft and Conga for our business?
- Start from your highest-stakes requirement, whether that is adoption, search, support, or roadmap, and weigh each platform against it rather than the whole feature list. An independent CLM vendor-selection process maps your real workflows to the right tool, which is exactly the work Koho does with clients evaluating Agiloft, Conga, and the wider market.